Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 25 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
785 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`884 kg | 1`959 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`380 kg | 1`490 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 504 kg | 469 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |