Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 18 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Trax has 49 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. This could mean that the Chevrolet Trax uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Chevrolet Trax can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`884 | 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |