Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Trax is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`884 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |