Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`884 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |