Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 18 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Trax gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 2.06 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, 28 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1238 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Trax has 23 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The Ford EcoSport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`884 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests, but Ford EcoSport is better rated in child safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |