Chevrolet Trax 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Trax
2017 - 2022
Mitsubishi ASX
2017 - 2019
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Chevrolet Trax is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi ASX has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 1.41.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 140 HP117 - 150 HP
Torque: 200 NM154 - 197 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 - 10.6 seconds11.4 - 11.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.4 - 8.76.1 - 7.7
Chevrolet Trax petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 157 mm (6.2 inches)190 mm (7.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.30 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.65 m1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres384 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1371 litres1219 litres
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Trax (by 152 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Gross weight: no data~ 1`920 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data11 600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Trax has
  • automatic transmission only
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • both manual and automatic
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv