Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 140 HP | 110 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 - 300 NM | 155 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.3 seconds | 9.4 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.5 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Trax petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka. On average, Chevrolet Trax equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`863 | ~ 1`929 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |