Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 140 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 - 300 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.3 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.5 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Trax petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Chevrolet Trax equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Trax is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`863 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |