Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 140 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 - 300 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.3 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.5 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Trax petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Chevrolet Trax equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`863 | ~ 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |