Chevrolet Traverse 2009 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 281 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Traverse engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 6 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 12.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Traverse is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Traverse consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Traverse over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Traverse gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Traverse engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.73 m | |
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 691 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 691 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | 2852 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Traverse (by 444 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`930 | 1`964 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Traverse has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |