Chevrolet Traverse 2009 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 288 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Traverse engine produces 28 HP more power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 11.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Traverse is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Traverse consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Traverse over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 691 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Traverse has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Traverse has 456 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. The Subaru B9 Tribeca may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`930 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Traverse has
|
| |