Chevrolet Traverse 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Traverse engine produces 8 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Traverse consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Traverse could require 510 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Equinox | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.67 m | |
| Chevrolet Traverse is 39 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Traverse is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 651 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 651 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2781 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Traverse is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`978 | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 43 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |