Chevrolet Traverse 2012 vs Mazda CX-9 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 288 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Traverse engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 1 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | 11.3 | |
| Chevrolet Traverse consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Traverse could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-9 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.17 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chevrolet Traverse is larger. Chevrolet Traverse is 8 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Traverse is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 691 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 691 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3293 litres | 2852 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Traverse has more luggage space (by 204 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Traverse (by 441 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Traverse has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |