Chevrolet Traverse 2009 vs Ford Explorer 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Traverse is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Explorer can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Traverse also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 | 4.0 - 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 281 - 288 HP | 213 - 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 - 366 NM | 344 - 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 10.2 | 13.5 - 14.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Traverse petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 691 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`930 | ~ 2`829 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Traverse has
|
| |