Chevrolet Traverse 2012 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 | 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 281 - 288 HP | 273 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 - 366 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 - 14.4 | 11.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Traverse petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.17 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chevrolet Traverse is larger. Chevrolet Traverse is 8 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Traverse is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 691 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3293 litres | 2852 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Traverse has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Traverse has 204 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Traverse (by 441 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Traverse has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |