Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Tahoe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 519 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 165 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 7.0 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 735 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 433 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2681 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Chevrolet Tahoe can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`220 kg | 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`479 kg | 1`958 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 741 kg | 1`052 kg | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 42 procentiem less than Nissan Navara. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |