Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.8 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 278 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 43 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 41 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 16.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Tahoe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 16 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |