Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 vs Dodge Durango 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.8 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 278 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 NM | 393 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 40 HP more power than Dodge Durango, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 14.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Tahoe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chevrolet Tahoe version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is 5 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | no data | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage space. Chevrolet Tahoe has 72 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |