Chevrolet Tahoe 2004 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.8 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 290 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 59 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 10 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 14.9 | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Tahoe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chevrolet Tahoe version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Chevrolet Tahoe 2004 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 30 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 518 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1011 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chevrolet Tahoe can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |