Chevrolet Tahoe 1996 vs Ford F150 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 441 NM | 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 42 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 14.7 | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 114 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is smaller. Chevrolet Tahoe is 90 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1481 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2815 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.7 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`965 | 3`198 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Ford F150 has
| |