Chevrolet Tahoe 1995 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 44 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 11.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 720 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 8 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1481 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2815 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |