Chevrolet Tahoe 1995 vs Land Rover Defender 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 18.6 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 67 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Land Rover Defender. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 10.1 | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 915 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 2.04 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Tahoe is 19 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1481 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2815 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |