Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Tahoe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 426 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 624 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 272 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 244 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 750 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 26 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 433 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2681 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 41 400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |