Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Tahoe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 426 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 624 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 272 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 244 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.0 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 750 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 26 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 433 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2681 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 41 400 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |