Chevrolet Tahoe 2007 vs Nissan Navara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Tahoe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 324 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 461 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 150 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 8.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Suburban | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Tahoe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3084 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 1.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Chevrolet Tahoe can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`220 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |