Chevrolet Tahoe 2007 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Tahoe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 324 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 461 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 181 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 131 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 289 mm (11.4 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chevrolet Tahoe version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Chevrolet Tahoe 2007 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 6 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 29 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 34 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3084 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`220 kg | 2`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`430 kg | 1`845 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 790 kg | 1`055 kg | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |