Chevrolet Tahoe 2007 vs Ford F150 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 324 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 461 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 13.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Tahoe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.89 m | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is 76 cm shorter than the Ford F150, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 1572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3084 litres | 1855 litres | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe has 1093 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`220 | 3`221 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Ford F150 has
| |