Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 148 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Tahoe reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 12.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Tahoe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Tahoe is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 29 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |