Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Tahoe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 148 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Tahoe reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.0 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 645 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Tahoe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Tahoe is 32 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 34 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 742 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 282 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1770 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |