Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 vs Porsche Cayenne 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 23 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 117 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Tahoe reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 13.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.0 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Tahoe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Tahoe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 27 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | 1770 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 80 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.3 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 2`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |