Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 vs Infiniti FX 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 366 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Infiniti FX is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 7 HP less power than Infiniti FX, but torque is 61 NM more than Infiniti FX. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Tahoe reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 12.1 | |
|
The Infiniti FX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Infiniti FX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Infiniti FX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Tahoe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 25 cm longer than the Infiniti FX, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 776 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | 1826 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 316 litres less trunk space than the Infiniti FX. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1094 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres less than that of the Infiniti FX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Infiniti FX has
| |