Chevrolet Tahoe 2000 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Tahoe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Hyundai Terracan) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 123 HP more power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Hyundai Terracan. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Tahoe reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.0 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Terracan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 6.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Tahoe could require 1020 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Tahoe consumes 5.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Terracan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Express, Chevrolet Suburban | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 34 cm longer than the Hyundai Terracan, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | 1955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 710 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 965 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |