Chevrolet Tahoe 1995 vs Suzuki Vitara 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 455 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 153 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 323 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 55 litres | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 103 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 30 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1481 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2815 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Tahoe has 901 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`865 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |