Chevrolet Tahoe 1995 vs Jeep Wrangler 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 455 NM | 296 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 73 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 159 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 72 litres | |
640 km with real consumption | 420 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Jeep Wrangler 1996 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.06 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 118 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 20 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1481 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2815 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`865 | 1`965 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 13 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
| |