Chevrolet Tahoe 1995 vs Ford F150 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 455 NM | 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 114 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.93 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is smaller. Chevrolet Tahoe is 63 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1481 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2815 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.7 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`865 | 3`266 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Ford F150 has
| |