Chevrolet Tahoe 2020 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Defender can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Tahoe also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Land Rover Defender is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 277 - 420 HP | 200 - 635 HP | |
| Torque: | 519 - 623 NM | 350 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 2.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Defender. On average, Chevrolet Tahoe equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.35 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.06 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Tahoe is 33 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 722 litres | 2059 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3479 litres | 2277 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1202 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Chevrolet Tahoe can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`361 kg | ~ 3`242 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`589 kg | ~ 2`392 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 772 kg | ~ 850 kg | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Land Rover Defender. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 58 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |