Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-9 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Tahoe also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 5.3 - 6.2 | 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 - 426 HP | 273 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 519 - 624 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 - 12.1 | 11.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 9 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2681 litres | 2852 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-9 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 54 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`265 | ~ 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 61 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |