Chevrolet Tahoe 2014 vs Ford F150 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 5.3 - 6.2 (petrol) | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford F150 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 355 - 426 HP | 250 - 450 HP | |
Torque: | 519 - 624 NM | 542 - 691 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 - 12.1 | 10.2 - 11.8 | |
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford F150. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.18 m | 5.91 m | |
Width: | 2.04 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.96 m | |
Chevrolet Tahoe is 73 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 1495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2681 litres | no data | |
Ford F150 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Tahoe has 1062 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`265 | ~ 3`321 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 61 200 | 42 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Ford F150 has
| |