Chevrolet Tahoe 2007 vs Ford F150 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.8 - 6.2 | 3.5 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 295 - 395 HP | 248 - 411 HP | |
| Torque: | 414 - 565 NM | 294 - 588 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 13.5 | 12.4 - 15.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford F150. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.13 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Tahoe is 76 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 1572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3084 litres | 1855 litres | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe has 1093 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 14.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 2.4 metres less than that of the Ford F150, which means Chevrolet Tahoe can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`266 | ~ 3`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Ford F150 has
| |