Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Tahoe also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.8 - 6.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 305 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 - 481 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 15.7 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 178 - 204 mm (7 - 8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 30 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 518 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1011 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chevrolet Tahoe can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`026 | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |