Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.8 - 6.0 | 4.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 305 HP | 235 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 - 481 NM | 382 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 7.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 15.7 | 12.2 - 14.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 226 - 231 mm (8.9 - 9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 25 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2920 litres | 2050 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 870 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Tahoe is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Chevrolet Tahoe can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`026 kg | ~ 2`411 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`320 kg | ~ 1`913 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 706 kg | ~ 498 kg | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Toyota 4-Runner. Therefore, Chevrolet Tahoe is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |