Chevrolet Tahoe 1999 vs Dodge Durango 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.8 - 6.0 | 3.7 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 305 HP | 213 - 349 HP | |
| Torque: | 393 - 481 NM | 319 - 509 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 15.7 | 13.0 - 14.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Durango. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Chevrolet Tahoe is 5 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2920 litres | no data | |
|
Dodge Durango has more luggage space. Chevrolet Tahoe has 72 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`026 | ~ 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |