Chevrolet Tahoe 1995 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.7 - 6.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 258 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 455 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 - 16.2 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe is larger. Chevrolet Tahoe is 27 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Tahoe is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1481 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3480 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Tahoe has 422 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Chevrolet Tahoe uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1560 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`958 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Tahoe has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |