Chevrolet Suburban 2014 vs Toyota Tundra 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 519 NM | 543 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 26 HP less power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | 15.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Suburban is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Suburban consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Suburban over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 120 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Suburban gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 269 mm (10.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.70 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.93 m | |
| Chevrolet Suburban is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Tundra, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1113 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3429 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 14.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Suburban is 1.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Chevrolet Suburban can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`402 | 3`266 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 37 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |