Chevrolet Suburban 2014 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Suburban) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 519 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 205 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 144 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Suburban reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Suburban consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Suburban could require 600 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.70 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is larger. Chevrolet Suburban is 34 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1113 litres | 1210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3429 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Suburban has 97 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. This could mean that the Chevrolet Suburban uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Suburban is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Chevrolet Suburban can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`311 | 1`144 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |