Chevrolet Suburban 2014 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Suburban) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 519 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 155 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Suburban consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Suburban could require 600 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.70 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is larger. Chevrolet Suburban is 34 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1113 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3429 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`311 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 31 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |