Chevrolet Suburban 2014 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Suburban) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 355 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 519 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 155 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Suburban reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Suburban consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Suburban could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.70 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is larger. Chevrolet Suburban is 34 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1113 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3429 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`311 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`569 kg | 2`167 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 742 kg | 1`033 kg | |
| Chevrolet Suburban load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 39 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |