Chevrolet Suburban 2006 vs Ford F150 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 4.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 324 HP | 385 HP | |
Torque: | 470 NM | 525 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 61 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 | 13.8 | |
The Chevrolet Suburban is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Suburban consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Suburban over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 87 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Suburban gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.65 m | 5.89 m | |
Width: | 2.01 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.95 m | 1.92 m | |
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Suburban is 24 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1297 litres | 1495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3890 litres | 2200 litres | |
Chevrolet Suburban has 198 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Suburban (by 1690 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7800 | 28 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Ford F150 has
| |