Chevrolet Suburban 2000 vs Ford Excursion 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.0 Petrol | 5.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Suburban) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Excursion) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 325 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 488 NM | 745 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Suburban and Ford Excursion have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Suburban torque is 257 NM less than Ford Excursion. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 167 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.57 m | 5.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller. Chevrolet Suburban is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Excursion, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1295 litres | 1359 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3720 litres | 4145 litres | |
|
Ford Excursion has more luggage space. Chevrolet Suburban has 64 litres less trunk space than the Ford Excursion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Excursion (by 425 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`900 | 4`037 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Excursion has
| |