Chevrolet Suburban 2000 vs Ford Excursion 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 6.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 290 HP | 314 HP | |
| Torque: | 441 NM | 578 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 24 HP less power than Ford Excursion, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Ford Excursion. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 19.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 167 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.57 m | 5.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Suburban is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Excursion, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | 1359 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3720 litres | 4145 litres | |
|
Ford Excursion has more luggage space. Chevrolet Suburban has 69 litres less trunk space than the Ford Excursion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Excursion (by 425 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 4`037 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Excursion has
| |