Chevrolet Suburban 2000 vs Ford F150 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 290 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 441 NM | 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 114 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.57 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Suburban is 11 cm shorter than the Ford F150, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3720 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.7 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`198 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`395 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 890 kg | 803 kg | |
| Chevrolet Suburban load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Ford F150. Therefore, Chevrolet Suburban is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Ford F150 has
| |